Sex dating in graterford pennsylvania
¶ 9 A person may be convicted of attempted murder "if he takes a substantial step toward the commission of a killing, with the specific intent in mind to commit such an act." Commonwealth v. I don't know, a kid that just got a new toy or something." Id. Grow said that Dale looked at him and said, "Yeah, well he had it coming[.] . He shouldn't make it, though, because we got his jugular vein." Id. ¶ 12 Jason Selders, the victim also testified at trial regarding the events of that day. Selders further testified: So I used his gloves and went over, and I laid down on the bench and started to do my bench presses, and we were just talking, you know, like every other day. Therefore, having determined that there was sufficient evidence for the fact finder to conclude that each element of the offense of attempted murder has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, we also conclude that there was sufficient evidence for the fact finder to conclude that each element of aggravated assault has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. In its 1925(a) Opinion, the trial court set forth its rationale for refusing to allow Dale to impeach the Common-wealth's witness by cross-examining him regarding convictions for offenses that were not crimen falsi, saying: [D]efendant asserts we "erred" by denying his request to cross-examine witness William Grow regarding his entire criminal record, after he testified that he was in prison for "DUI". Grow was serving his sentence in a State Correctional Institution because it was committed while he was under supervision of the State Parole Board.
Grow said that he walked away and shortly thereafter heard the dumbbells drop to the ground, turned and saw Dale trying to hold Selders down when Selders tried to get off the bench. Grow described Dale as, "crazy eyed" and further observed that Dale "was all excited like. They'll be coming to get me pretty soon, if he lives.
"The intent which is a prerequisite to a finding of murder is `malice aforethought' or simply, malice." Id. Malice consists "either of a wickedness of disposition, hardness of heart, cruelty, recklessness of consequences, and a mind regardless of social duty, indicating unjustified disregard for the probability of death or great bodily harm." Id. "Malice is the distinguishing factor between murder and the lesser degrees of homicide." Commonwealth v. Their plan was to, "shut his mouth" by slitting Selders' throat while he was lifting weights. After Selders ran for help, Tout watched Thornton and Dale walk to the back of the yard and wash their hands and sneakers in a puddle. Grow testified that he walked into the prison yard with Dale, and Thornton joined them.
Timothy Tout, cell-mate of Dale's co-conspirator, Eric Thornton, testified that Selders was causing problems because he was telling the other inmates that Thornton and Dale were snitches. Tout then saw Dale drop his weight, pull a sock full of batteries out of his back pocket or waist and hit Selders on his shoulder. ¶ 11 William Grow, Dale's cellmate, was also in the prison yard at the time of the incident and confirmed Tout's description of the events in the yard.
are permitted on Thursday through Sunday only, and state approved holidays that fall on Monday.
It may take time to locate an individual inmate for a visit, so please be patient. D., passport, citizenship or naturalization card, Liquor Control Board or Commonwealth non-driver I. Identification beyond the expiration date will not be acceptable.
"A jury may properly infer malice from the use of a deadly weapon on a vital part of the victim's body." Id. ¶ 10 Several witnesses testified regarding Dale's intention to kill Selders and the substantial steps he took toward accomplishing Selders' murder. Tout said that Thornton showed him the razor, melted into the end of a toothbrush, that they intended to use as the murder weapon. Tout observed Thornton shake something in his hand and reach across and cut Selders' throat.
Tout further testified that he was in the prison yard at the time of the attempted murder, and saw both Dale and Thornton next to Selders while he was lifting weights.
The Commonwealth alleged that Dale together with Thornton, attempted to murder Jason Selders, another inmate, by cutting his throat. Keeping in mind our standard of review, we will examine Dale's insufficiency claims.
And he come around and I seen the shiny something, and he come around and cut my throat. ¶ 13 The above testimony more than adequately demonstrates Dale's intent to murder Selders, and the substantial steps he took toward the accomplishment of his objective. 1995) (affirmed conviction of attempted murder that was supported by evidence of intent to kill, and proof of substantial steps taken to cause death, regardless of evidence that defendant did not aim or fire gun at intended victim and no injury occurred). ¶ 15 Finally, Dale claims that the trial court erred when it refused to permit him to cross-examine a Commonwealth witness regarding prior convictions that were not crimen falsi convictions. Moreover, we fail to see how escape meets the requirements for a crime of crimen falsi. The Commonwealth moved to preclude evidence that he was then a prisoner. The defense argued that the alleged minor nature of the offense of driving while intoxicated required us to inform the jury of Mr.
Selders said that Dale loaned him his gloves and offered to spot for him, immediately prior to the incident. Then when I had the weights up above my head, James Dale jumps on my side here, on my left leg, right in here, he jumped on me and at the same time Eric Grabbed by head and pulled it back. Thus, Dale's claim regarding the insufficiency of evidence for aggravated assault must also fail. However, this Court has also found that sexual offenses, such as rape and prostitution, are not crimen falsi crimes and, therefore, convictions for sexual offenses may not be used to impeach the credibility of a witness. Dale was unable to find any support for his argument that the crime of escape is a crimen falsi crime, Appellant's Brief, at 13, and we also found none. ¶ 18 We agree with the opinion of the trial court that it, "did not commit `error' by limiting impeachment of Mr. At the time his testimony was given the maximum term of the state sentence had expired.
There must be an authorized 313 form on file for each child.
The individual accompanying a minor is responsible for the welfare and behavior of the minor and any damages the minor may cause while in the visiting room or on state property.
It is recommended that you arrive as early in the day as possible so that proper arrangements can be made in time for your visit. Acceptable forms of photo identification include any one of the following: drivers license, photo welfare, military, bank, employee or school I. Any two of the following are acceptable non-photo identification: Voters Registration card, Medicare card, learners permit or temporary drivers license, vehicle registration, birth certificate, school identification, immunization record or a Social Security card.